JEFF CUBOS
  • Blog
  • OLAD
  • Reviews
    • CE Reviews
    • Research Reviews
    • Book Notes
  • About

SMT, Meds and Exercise for Neck Pain

1/4/2012

0 Comments

 
Study Title: Spinal manipulation, medication, or home exercise with advice for acute and subacute neck pain: a randomized trial
Authors: G. Bronfort, R. Evans, A. Anderson, K. Svendson, Y. Bracha, R. Grimm
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine
Date: 2012
.
My thoughts
  • First of all, seeing this study capture the attention of many manual and rehabilitation therapists through the power of the internet reminded me of the old "Start the Car" ikea commercial.
  • As a chiropractor that highly values exercise and rehabilitation, most would assume that I too would take this paper, "start the car", and run away with it. Unfortunately, I wanted to read the actual paper and see what all the hype was about beyond the good publicity from the New York Times.
  • There's no question that I strongly believe manipulation and exercise may be better alternatives to medication in some if not many "pain" presentations, however, overtime I have learned to become more attached to patient-specific care more than anything else. Patient-specific care may indeed call for meds, manipulation and exercise - but patient-specific care may also call for reassurance, education, and / or soft tissue therapy.
  • Now having read the actual study, the authors did do a relatively good job to prescribe individually based exercises but I do think they could have been more thorough. Gentle stretching and scapular retraction exercises, as well as neck and possibly (although not convincing in this paper) thoracic manipulations don't cut it when it comes to sending a message that SMT and exercise are better than meds. I understand that this is a research paper so I will accept some limitations in the study.
  • While there was significant difference in follow up at 6 months, no significant differences were found at the 1 year mark of follow up when compared to baseline. To me, this likely indicates symptomatic relief or treating the DP (which I think is ok)...but what about the root cause? And what about integrated care? Because how often do you just manipulate or just rehab? I know quite well many of you who read this blog also combine the two. But you probably combine other therapeutic approaches as well. What I don't want to see is manipulating people's necks for the simple reason that this paper said it was more beneficial. If it is indicated, and the patient consents, then by all means. But if not, don't "start the car". We need to be more precise and we need to be accountable.
  • Again, it is a research study and I get that we can't control for everything in research but I do think we can be a little more responsible when drinking the kool-aid. And responsibility means taking an objective, rather than emotional opinion...especially on social media. So please feel free to advocate that SMT and Exercise may sometimes be better a alternative than medication for neck pain (and that meds are often unnecessary), but please also recognize that generalizing the study's results to all of your patients is an act that is no different than advocating for meds alone.

Bronfort, G et al. (2012). Spinal manipulation, medication, or home exercise with advice for acute and subacute neck pain: a randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, vol 156; 1-10....
0 Comments

MSK Myths

12/19/2011

0 Comments

 
Title: Musculoskeletal Myths
Author: C. Liebenson
Journal: Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Date: December 2011
.
Summary:
  • A must read for all professionals in the health care and fitness industries. In this review, Craig Liebenson not only utilizes the current state of the literature to debunk 10 widely common myths in low back health, but also provides us with evidence-informed alternatives and explanations. From the role of diagnostic imaging in low back pain to spine stability and pain science, Liebenson does an eloquent job in stressing the importance of a science-based approach to patient management and the value in active care. Some of the myths discussed are: "the cause of musculoskeletal pain can be found on an x-ray or MRI"; "let pain be your guide"; "the deep intrinsic muscles...are the keys to stability"; and "we should breathe out with exertion-right?".
  • In addition to the exposure of these myths, Liebenson also introduces the reader to a new paradigm of care that is grounded in the functional assessment.  It has been highly stressed that we, as clinicians, should be focusing more on the source - rather than the site - of pain, and Liebenson provides us with a clear rationale for this approach. He further provides specific evidence via regional interdependence of this paradigm shift.
.
"This new paradigm requires a reevaluation of a number of current tenets of care. If this happens a more patient-centered approach which is designed to help patients safely return to activities which are important to them will result".

Liebenson, C. (2011). Musculoskeletal Myths. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.11.003.
0 Comments

Vojta / Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization in a Migraine Sufferer

10/10/2011

0 Comments

 
Study Title: A Case Study Utilizing Vojta/Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Therapy to Control Symptoms of a Chronic Migraine Sufferer
Authors: DD. Juehring & MR. Barber
Journal: Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Date: October 2011

  • A relatively low level of evidence but a good read nonetheless. This recent case study published in the Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies described the use of the Vojta/Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization treatment strategy for chronic migraine symptoms in a 49-year old female. Hypothesized to be triggered via neural mechanisms, this type of headache has been described to be modulated supraspinally and often has been elusive to conventional treatment strategies. The specific treatment strategy reported was described (although not directly stated) to be via reflex stimulation of the breast zone in the first phase of reflex turning. For those of you who are unaware, the breast zone is located at the widest intercostal space between ribs 5-8, nearby the mamillary line. Subjective improvement was reported over the 12-week course of therapy via the Headache Disability Index and VAS pain scale measures, although there was no mention of any cognitive approach to care. Several other unsuccessful treatment strategies previously undertaken over the span of 20 years were mentioned, however, unfortunately no statements pertaining to follow up of this particular strategy could be found. Overall, I thought this was a good start to getting the efficacy of DNS in the English published literature, but I do recognize its limitations and that we still have a long way to go. In particular, I would like to see more advanced forms of DNS utilized in the literature, especially utilized in athletic populations, as well as published research with higher levels of evidence. That said, I myself have utilized this treatment approach in a variety of patients (athletic injuries, neurological pathologies, chronic pain, etc) often with very successful results, so I have no doubt of its positive effect on this 49-year old woman.

Juehring DD & Barber MR. (2011). A case study utilizing Vojta/Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization therapy to control symptoms of a chronic migraine sufferer. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 15; 538-541
0 Comments

Neck Strength and Head Impacts in Ice Hockey

9/17/2011

0 Comments

 
Study Title: Does cervical muscle strength in youth ice hockey players affect head impact biomechanics?
Authors: JP. Mihalik, KM. Guskiewicz, SW. Marshall et al.
Journal: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Date: September 2011


Summary:
  • Some of you are aware that Hockey Canada recently instituted their new Head Contact Rule in an attempt to minimize head and neck injuries, including concussions. While I think this is certainly a giant leap in the right direction, there are also many other factors to consider when it comes to injury prevention. In this particular study, Mihalik and his group of researchers looked at the role of more "internal factors" for head injury prevention, specifically cervical muscle strength. The rationale for this paper was based on the speculation that the neck can be strengthened to reduce the risk of mild traumatic brain injuries by way of tension to withstand and distribute the force of head impact.
  • This prospective cohort study utilized AAA hockey players (aged 15 + 1 year) wearing helmets equipped with Head Impact Telemetry to record impact force data (linear, rotational and HIT severity profile) in real-time. Using a handheld dynamometer, body relative cervical muscle strength (as described by Kendall) of the anterior neck flexors, anterolateral neck flexors, cervical rotators, posterolateral neck extensors, and upper trapezius were measured. These results were then used to categorize the players into three groups based on strength (weak, moderate and strong) for the purposes of comparative analysis.
  • Of the 7770 total impacts recorded over the course of one season, it was revealed that increased isometric cervical strength did not reduce the severity of head impacts. In fact, those players with weaker upper trapezius muscles experienced lower impact severity scores than those with the strongest recordings.
  • Personally, I am not prepared to discredit the role of neck strengthening as a potential protective mechanism but I do think some things (relevant to this aspect of injury prevention) need to be considered. First, I am not quite sure how the results from a shrugging maneuver (as used to test the upper trapezius) can be relevant regardless of the findings. I would put more weight into those results from each of the other testing procedures. Second, I'm more of a quality of muscle activation kind of guy rather than a quantity. Does quantity matter? Of course, but I do think that the ability to reflexively stabilize a joint upon impact is more important than absolute strength. I would liked to have seen Janda's and Jull's tests rather than the ones used. Finally, we should remember that the results of this paper are demographic specific. At this age, the players are not only still developing physically, but they are also still learning the art of both rendering and receiving contact. Therefore, I would like to see a similar study performed at higher levels and at the very least, in junior age players.

Mihalik, JP et al. (2011). Does cervical muscle strength in youth ice hockey players affect head impact biomechanics? Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol 21(5); 416-421

0 Comments

Spine Stability and the Balancing Stick

9/1/2011

0 Comments

 
Study Title: Spine stability: Lessons from a balancing stick
Authors: NP. Reeves, KS, Narendra & J. Cholewicki
Journal: Clinical Biomechanics
Date: 2011

Summary:
  • Reeves does it again! This paper here was a continuation of his "Spine Stability" series of papers and although not an actual study, was an excellent "lecture" piece. Coming off of his Six Blind Men & the Elephant paper where he looked at the role and importance of robustness (or variability) for both static and dynamic stability , Reeves uses a simple object, a stick, to provide us with a conceptual, but comprehensive lesson in spinal stability. In this paper, he walks us through five different "lessons", all pertaining to a stick (or two) being balanced, to help us look further into the information necessary to stabilize the spine, noise in control and spine performance, spine evolution for stabilization and efficient control, control delays and spine performance, and the role of goals for spine control. All pertaining to feedback control.
  • His first experiment examined the role tracking plays in stability through positive and negative feedback. It was discovered that inorder to balance a stick in the hand effectively, one must possess both position and velocity related feedback. The lesson from this was that the central nervous system monitors both position and velocity during spinal movement for each degree of freedom (rotation and translation about each axis) it possesses. Its significance? That muscle spindles, especially of the deep musculature, play an important role by measuring both muscle length and rate of change for spinal stability.
  • His second experiment examined tracking into more detail by looking at precision. Using similar concepts to the image above, he placed a weight on the top of the stick for one trial and down at the bottom for the next to understand angular displacement and velocity. It was realized that balancing the stick with a weight at the bottom created a larger "gain" (or necessary force) to maintain equilibrium and as such, the lesson was learned that impairments in tracking the spine will impair control and may lead to non-optimal recruitment patterns. Therefore, the relevance of this was that not only is position-related feedback important but also velocity related feedback for spinal control.
  • The third experiment looked into controllability and observability. Using two different trials of stick balancing (one with two sticks in series - on top of each other - and the other with two sticks in parallel - beside each other), it was revealed that multiple masses will have different movement characteristics. The lesson from this experiment was that independent control of the various spine segments through its physical make up and neural recruitment may be important for feedback control and subsequent stability, as well as metabolic efficiency.
  • His fourth experiment examined delays in feedback control. By utilizing multiple trials with various stick lengths, it was revealed that shorter sticks make balancing more difficult due to an increase in size and rate of oscillation. He attributed this to delays in feedback control. The relevance? In rapid dynamic environments, feedback control may negatively influence spine control, especially in the low back pain population.
  •  The final experiment was more of an observation looking at various control strategies. Realistically, there are many different ways to balance a stick and so for any given task, there will likely be an infinite number of possible feedback gains to provide stability. Ultimately, the objective should be to respect the goals of the system (or the person) whether it be for maximizing performance or minimizing costs. The takeaway from here is that the central nervous system should learn the dynamics of the spine system and that neuromuscular retraining may be valuable to help "reset control to a more desirable strategy".

  • We must remember, however, that this was a "lecture" piece rather than an actual clinical trial or review. The principles in this paper are quite sound but as always, more rigorous research in these topics must be performed especially with humans as subjects.

Reeves, NP. et al. (2011). Spine stability: Lessons from a balancing stick. Clinical Biomechanics, vol 26; 325 - 330
0 Comments

Postoperative Gluteus Medius Rehab with Consideration of the Iliopsoas

8/18/2011

0 Comments

 
Study Title: Rehabilitation Exercise Progression for the Gluteus Medius Muscle With Consideration for Iliopsoas Tendinitis
Authors: MJ. Philippon, MJ. Decker, E. Giphart, MR. Tory, MS. Wahoff & RF. LaPrade
Journal: American Journal of Sports Medicine
Date: 2011
​
Summary:
  • This paper is a MUST READ for rehabilitation and training professionals working in ice hockey, especially those of you in the "show". As you know, Dr. Marc Philippon is one of the world's leading hip surgeons and like the physician you refer your athletes with problematic hip injuries to. Published in AJSM, this paper looked identified the most appropriate EARLY postoperative hip exercises following hip surgery. With consideration of the fact that the Iliopsoas tendon occasionally becomes irritated or inflamed with early rehabilitation, the Dr. Philippon and friends utilized EMG to determine which of 13 exercises were most appropriate and when. To sum up the results, the exercises that demonstrated the highest peak gluteus medius muscle activation were the single-leg bridge, the prone heel squeeze, and the side-lying hip abduction (either performed with internal hip rotation, against a wall, or with external hip rotation). In comparison, the supine hip flexion, side-lying hip abduction with external rotation, and hip clam exercises  demonstrated moderate iliopsoas muscle activation. As a result, the exercises with the best ratios (high gluteus medius activity vs low iliopsoas activity) were the prone heel squeeze, single-leg bridge, and the side-lying hip abduction with internal rotation. Please note that all exercises were then classified into their most appropriate phase of rehabilitation: I, II, or III.
  • What really caught my attention with this study was the lack of discussion pertaining to optimal and controlled muscle activation of the core musculature in general. It is my assumption that proper progression of early rehabilitation will respect optimal core control and integrity and subsequently optimal iliopsoas activity. It is difficult for me to swallow that those professionals adhering to proper progressions and appropriate rehabilitation principles actually elicit unwanted and increased iliopsoas activity. That said, this study must have been warranted and therefore must speak volumes of the rehabilitation protocols currently prescribed.
  • Overall, I really enjoyed this paper and certainly walked away with a better understanding of EARLY postoperative gluteus medius and hip rehabilitation.

Philippon, M. et al. (2011). Rehabilitation exercise progression for the gluteus medius muscle with consideration for iliopsoas tendinitis. American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 39(8); 1777-1785
0 Comments

Respiratory Evaluation and Training as an Adjunct to Manual Therapy

8/9/2011

0 Comments

 
Study Title: Breathing Evaluation and Retraining as an Adjunct to Manual Therapy
Authors: L. McLaughlin, C.H. Goldsmith & K. Coleman
Journal: Manual Therapy
Date: 2011

Summary:
  • Here's a short little study that evaluated the presence of poor respiratory chemistry in patients suffering from neck and low back pain, as well as the efficacy of biofeedback training on chemistry, pain and function. If you are a frequent reader of this blog then you'll know that trunk muscles have a dual postural stability and respiratory function. You'll also know that the presence of poor respiratory control may result in faulty thoracic, cervical, and scapular mechanics. Well the authors of this paper took a series of 29 cases with neck and/or back pain who failed conservative outpatient manual and rehabilitative therapy and studied whether or not they possessed poor respiratory chemistry.  Such (poor) chemistry was identified via a capnograph which measures CO2 levels at the end of a normal exhale.
  • Respiratory retraining was the main intervention in this study, consisting of awareness training, capnograph feedback, and manual therapy to improve mobility. Not only did the results demonstrate that all 29 patients possessed below normal ETCO2 levels, but outcome measures recorded improved in all patients following the intervention.
  • While most, if not all, of you probably do not own a capnograph, this study does provide good evidence that 1) many of your patients suffering from neck and/or back pain probably also have some level of poor respiratory control, and 2) pain levels can improve following a clinical intervention that includes both respiratory training and manual mobilization.
  • Unfortunately however, most physical therapy, chiropractic, athletic training, and massage therapy programs don't include respiratory training techniques in their educational curriculum. 

McLaughlin, L. et al. (2011). Breathing evaluation and retraining as an adjunct to manual therapy. Manual Therapy, 16; 51-52.
0 Comments

The Role of Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain

4/20/2011

0 Comments

 
Study Title: Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain: Advice for High-Value Health Care from the American College of Physicians
Authors: R. Chou, A. Qaseem, DK Owens et al.
Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine
Date: 2011

Summary: 
  • My full review of this paper was recently posted on Research Review Service but since I feel strongly about its message, I thought it would be a good idea to provide you with a brief introduction. In concert with the high incidence of low back pain in today's society lies a relatively high rate of requisitions for diagnostic imaging of neuromusculoskeletal conditions pertaining to the lumbar spine. Unfortunately, the appropriateness of such imaging studies may be questionable at best for many of these conditions owing to the fact that the outcome of care often leads to similar results in those patients who have undergone "routine" imaging and those who have not regardless of whether such tests were performed. Certainly, such imaging may be required for those patients suffering from severe and /  or progressive neurological deficits as well as for those presenting with serious underlying conditions however, more often than not, those patients presenting in general family, chiropractic or rehabilitation practices may do well without the unnecessary doses of radiation and costs to the health care systems. This best practice advice paper provided by the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians provides the medical reader with a summary of the current literature pertaining to the utility of diagnostic imaging for low back pain and advises on the rationale behind evidence-informed decision making when a patient presents with low back pain symptoms. Utilizing results from high-quality studies, suggestions are made for cost worthy diagnostic protocols and advice is given on the potential harms and benefits of radiological procedures. Additionally, a valuable summary for patients has also been provided of which can be easily accessed here.

R. Chou, A. Qaseem, DK. Owens et al. (2011). Diagnostic imaging for low back pain: Advice for high-value health care from the american college of physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 154; 181-189
0 Comments

Medical Therapies in Concussion

4/16/2011

0 Comments

 
Study Title: Medical Therapies for Concussion
Authors: W. Meehan
Journal: Clinics in Sports Medicine
Date: 2011

Summary:
  • Here is a little review of potential interventions in one of the most influential and highly discussed injuries in ice hockey today, concussion. While the current state of the literature may still be in its infancy, each incident of this "traumatic brain injury", particularly in professional hockey, seems to make front page news and cast a shadow of doubt on the safety of our sport. This paper by Meehan discusses various therapeutic options that may be rendered in the presence of such injury.
  • First introduced is the role of physical rest in the recovery process. The stepwise return to play protocol is discussed although it is mentioned that studies have begun investigating the role of light physical activity during recovery. Since quantitative cognitive deficits have been demonstrated in the presence of such injury, academic accommodations via cognitive rest were suggested for student athletes.
  • Often considered an "invisible injury", Meehan proposes that education regarding the typical recovery process be one of the mainstays of therapeutic intervention. Studies have demonstrated fewer symptoms at follow up in those that were informed about their symptoms, coping strategies, and the likely course of recovery.
  • While most athletes achieve spontaneous recovery of symptoms within days to weeks, some experience prolonged recovery to which pharmaceutical intervention may be warranted. It should be noted that the evidence for such interventions is very minimal and the following information should be taken as a summary rather than a recommendation of care. Meehan suggests that pharmacologic treatment only be considered in the presence of the following:

  1. Symptoms exceeding the typical recovery period,
  2. Symptoms negatively affecting quality of life to the degree that the treatment benefits outweigh its risks, and
  3. The clinician rendering treatment is both knowledgeable and experienced in the management of (sport) concussion.

  • Meehan asserts that pharmacologic treatment has yet to be demonstrated to speed the recovery process and that standard approaches are lacking. Instead, he reports that medications are utilized for the treatment of its signs and symptoms. Since previous literature has grouped symptoms related to sport concussion in the categories of sleep disturbance, somatic (i.e. headache), emotional, and cognitive, chosen medications must be specific to the symptom experienced.
  • In the presence of sleep disturbance, sleep hygiene that includes the elimination of constant stimuli (i.e. television, computers, caffeine, etc) is strongly considered. Medically, Meehan's first line of defence for the presence of sleep disturbance is Melatonin. Other considerations are discussed although benzodiazepines seem to be advocated against due to their negative arousal and cognition effects.
  • Somatic symptoms such as headaches are common in the presence of sport concussion. Meehan discusses the potential roles of antidepressants (i.e. amitriptyline - his preferred treatment) as well as the potential negative effects ("rebound") of analgesics such as ibuprofen. Other medications are introduced as well as physical therapy, psychotherapy, and trigger point injections.
  • For athletes suffering from emotional disturbance, for example stemming from participation restrictions, Meehan suggests tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin reuptake inhibitors as a complementary intervention to coping strategies, familial support and psychological counseling.
  • Finally, since cognitive symptoms are common complaints in those suffering from sport concussion, potential pharmacologic treatment may include methylphenidate for attention and speed processing deficits as well as the domaminergic agent amantadine for executive function and prefrontal cortex glucose metabolism, in addition to cognitive rehabilitation.
  • It should be noted that the majority of athletes recovery both spontaneously and quickly from sport concussions. The preceding review merely discusses potential medical interventions that may have complementary roles to physical and cognitive rest and rehabilitation. It must be reiterated that the above MUST NOT be taken as prescription but merely as a review of Meehan's academic paper, intended for medical professionals. If you or your family member has sustained a concussion, you MUST consult a physician for care.

Meehan WP. (2011). Medical therapies for concussion. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 30; 115-124.
0 Comments

Body Mass, Serum Sodium Concentrations & Prolonged Exercise

3/21/2011

0 Comments

 
Study Title: Changes in body mass alone explain almost all of the variance in the serum sodium concentrations during prolonged exercise. Has commercial influence impeded scientific endeavour?
Authors: T. Noakes
Journal: British Journal of Sports Medicine
Date: November 2011

Summary:
  • Here's a recent article published in BJSM and shared to me by my graduate co-supervisor, Joe Baker. Rather than being a randomized control trial, this is a highly opinionated and perhaps controversial paper expressing his feelings towards the American College of Sports Medicine outlining the significance of the omission of his previous findings on exercise-associated hyponatremia (EAH) during prolonged exercise. Specifically, based on research that does not include his previous studies in 1985 and 1991, it was promoted by the ACSM that athletes should consume, during exercise, as much fluid as tolerable. On the contrary, it was proposed by Noakes and colleagues that exercise-associated hyponatremia "appears to be (related to) voluntary hyperhydration with hypotonic solutions combined with moderate sweat sodium chloride losses". As an aside, it is not uncommon to witness typical EAH symptoms of vomiting, nausea, dizziness, altered mental status in less skilled (aka "slower") endurance athletes. While the principle argument for this paper was to suggest that very low levels of postexercisue serum sodium concentrations in athletes suffereing from EAH result from body weight gain secondary to fluid retention irrespective of volitional electrolyte (i.e. sodium) consumption, the main "takeaway" from this paper was that his research may be largely ignored due to commercial influence. What Noakes does suggest however, is that increasing sodium ingestion with increasing duration of exercise may not provide any biologically significant effect to countering EAH. So should we really still be drinking our Gatosauce or should we be paying more specific attention to our water consumption levels if we're less gifted and toward the "back of the pack".

Noakes, T. (2011) Changes in body mass alone explain almost all of the variance in the serum sodium concentrations during prolonged exercise. Has commercial influence impeded scientific endeavour? British Journal of Sports Medicine.

For those of you interested in another summary of this paper, please take a look at Alex Hutchinson's blog.
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>
    Picture

    Jeff Cubos

    MSc, DC, FRCCSS(C), CSCS

I created this blog to share my thoughts with others. It is not intended to be used for medical diagnosis, medical treatment or to replace evaluation by a health practitioner. If you have an individual medical problem, you should seek medical advice from a professional in your community. Any of the images I do use in this blog I claim no ownership of.
  • Blog
  • OLAD
  • Reviews
    • CE Reviews
    • Research Reviews
    • Book Notes
  • About